|
|
| Table of contents |
|
2 Value of the binomial system 3 Extending the binominal name 4 Hierarchy 5 Footnote 6 See also |
Origin of names
The names used are usually derived from Latin. Although Latin derivation is not universal (names sometimes come from Ancient Greek, sometimes from local languages, and often from the name of the person who first described a species), the names are always treated grammatically as if they were Latin words. For this reason the binomial name of a species is sometimes called its "Latin name", though this usage is frowned on by biologists. The term "Scientific name" is more acceptable. There is a separate list of Latin and Greek words commonly used in systematic names.
Value of the binomial system
The value of the binomial system derives primarily from its economy and its widespread use:
However, such stability as exists is far from being absolute. A single organism may have several scientific names in circulation, depending on opinion (see synonymy), conservation according to nomenclature codes, and new findings based on molecular phylogeny. Another source of instability is the rule that nomenclature should respect priority of discovery.
Extending the binominal name
Trinomial nomenclature
When a species is further divided, a trinomial nomenclature is used, e.g. Astrophytum myriostigma subvar. glabrum.
In botany, a species can be further divided into any of subspecies, variety, subvariety or form, whereas in zoology, a species is only subdivided into subspecies. Trinomial names of plants therefore usually include a qualifier (such as "subvar." in the example above), whereas trinomial names of animals never do. For example, Phalacrocorax carbo novaehollandiae is the Black Shag, the subspecies of the Great Cormorant found in Australia and New Zealand, and there is no need to indicate explicitly that novaehollandiae is a subspecies name.
Binomial nomenclature is only one of many conventions used to name organisms. Nomenclature codes rule the naming of plants (incl. Fungi, cyanobacteria) / cultivated plants / animals / bacteria / viruses. These codes differ. For example, the ICBN plant nomenclature does not allow tautonymy, whereas the ICZN animal code allows it. A BioCode has been suggested to replace several codes, but there also is debate of a PhyloCode to name clades of phylogenetic trees.
For more information on this system, please see scientific classification and numerical taxonomy.
Authorship in scientific names
Sometimes you will see a name or abbreviation after a scientific name, sometimes including a date, generally at the top of a page. An official reference to a species includes not only the genus and species, but the author(s) of the name. This is usually abbreviated if possible, e.g. Urtica dioica L. where "L." refers to Linnaeus. While the name is italicized, the author is not. If a species is moved into a different genus, the original author is put in parentheses and the author who moved it is appended, e.g. Chamaecyparis nootkatensis (D. Don) Spach which was originally described as Cupressus nootkatensis by D. Don. This has been recently moved to a new genus and has now become Xanthocyparis nootkatensis (D. Don) Farjon & Hiep. This addition of authorship is usually only done once in a particular article or citation. In articles where species are described or moved, the date is usually added as well but this is rare in encyclopedic or other non-taxonomic articles.Hierarchy
The binomial name of a species, of course, only reflects part of the larger classification of the organism:Footnote
See also