Guajara in other languages: Spanish, Deutsch, French, Italian ...



Dance film

Dance film is the use of the cinematographic art in capturing dance on camera. The use of clever camera work and editing can show dance in a way that very few people would ever have the chance to experience it. The passion and energy of dance does not translate well to video and so new techniques of shooting and editing are evolving whereby close-ups and other methods are attempting to convey the dynamics and motion of dance more accurately and more excitingly on the static screen.

Dance companies have used video to document their work for some decades, since video equipment became affordable. It is one of the only ways to maintain records of choreography, given the great difficulty of dance notation and the scarcity of notators. Some larger companies make very high quality recordings of their productions and sell VHS tapes to the general public for a profit.

However these recordings are usually done using the camera as an observer in the audience, merely recording the proceedings of a live performance onstage. It is common knowledge that this kind of recording does not capture the true energy and thrill of the live performance.

Dance film is in fact an art form separate from both dance and cinema. It is not new; dance films have been created since the beginning of the twentieth century when the rise of cinematography coincided with the rise of contemporary dance. However it is still a marginal and relatively little-known art form that does not get much publicity or funding. With the rise of technology and its integration with many art forms, this is changing.

Some dance films produce extraordinarily beautiful images, much more appealing to the average person than the point-and-record dance filming described in the previous paragraph. Other dance films, such as the work of the Sydney-based Simon James, produce very post-modern images comparable to alternative music film-clips. (Dance as an art form could well benefit by applying some of the music industry's principles of aesthetics (for example) and marketing in order that dance film becomes a more palatable and widespread form of dance distribution to a wider audience than live dance could ever reach.)

It is still, at present, comparatively rare that dance companies per se will invest in the production of such films (although it is an area generating cumulative interest in the dance industry). What immediately springs to mind is that DV8 do produce carefully crafted films of their major works, and the National Ballet of Canada produced the exquisitely filmed and processed ballet ‘The Four Seasons’ in 1994. However these projects appear as the exception to the rule.

The high cost of equipment and editing is largely a historical perception, one that is fast becoming nullified. Digital cameras are very affordable and the cost of editing software is falling quickly in our PC-reliant society. (Editing is still the most expensive part of the process to have done with expertise.) Perhaps most significantly, film is an area that holds enough glamour or kudos to attract willing helpers quite easily for those interested in getting started.

After making a dance film, the usual course of action is to apply for film festivals, in the hope that someone will see one’s work and commission a film, or give one a grant to produce another film. Perhaps the way a dance company should capitalise on the advantages of film is to market their films and sell them. The key could be to make films in such a way that an audience can relate to them, rather than to be determined to break current bounds and create an artistic revolution.





Wikipedia - All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License.

Tagoror dot com  -  Legal Information  -  Contact us